The best interventions against violence are based on socio-emotional learning.

Scientific Evidence Platform Hoax The best interventions against violence are based on socio-emotional learning.
0 Comments

COMMENT:

I think that this is false.

In recent years we have seen an increase in programs based on socio-emotional learning interventions (SEL) against violent behavior in childhood. While it has demonstrated any effectiveness, we need to know if it is the best possible intervention or there are others like behavioral interventions that offer better comparable results. 

Against violence is not enough to know the good, we need to know what is the best.

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES:

1) “The studies of behavioral interventions demonstrated the strongest effects on increasing prosocial behavior and decreasing antisocial behavior. These studies also included the highest quality of research. The social–emotional learning intervention studies consistently demonstrated weaker effects and lower quality research”

Sabey CV, Charlton CT, Pyle D, Lignugaris-Kraft B, Ross SW. A Review of Classwide or Universal Social, Emotional, Behavioral Programs for Students in Kindergarten. Review of Educational Research. 2017;87(3):512-543. doi:10.3102/0034654316689307

2)  This meta-analysis defined socio-emotional skills in this sentence: “The socio-emotional skills referred to intervention activities centered around specific social, emotional, and psychological concepts such as empathy, conflict resolution, problem-solving, self-control, decision-making, and prosocial or coping skills”. After, in the results of the analysis we can read this sentence: “Interestingly, the absence of socio-emotional skills was significantly correlated with larger subgroup summary effect sizes for school-bullying perpetration outcomes.”. So, SEL interventions increased bullying perpetration.

Gaffney, H.; Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components Journal of School Psychology, 2021, 85, 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002

 

 

Categories:
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gontzal Uriarte

COMMENT:

In this article, although they did not find much difference between the different methods, they found that behavioral programs had better results than others.

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE:

Wilson, Sandra Jo et al. School-Based Interventions for Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior. 2007. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Volume 33, Issue 2, S130 – S143. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.011

Last edited 5 months ago by Gontzal Uriarte
Participation in educational leisure time youth organizations contributes to civic engagement and participation.
El objetivo es demostrar la estrecha relación con el desarrollo de un perfil cívico activo
The quality of education is determined by whether the school is public or private.
Research continues on the differences in academic results between public and private schools. This difference
Inclusive education in Lithuania progresses very slowly
¿Por qué tomó tanto tiempo tener un sistema de educación inclusivo en las escuelas de
How important is first aid for teenagers?
Mental health first aid training was originally developed to enable adults to help other adults.
The myth of the influence of mixed schools in pregnancy
I think that the influence of co-educational schools on pregnancy is not so much but
Teachers’ frustration with new tecnologies and COVID19
We are currently experiencing a very complicated pandemic situation, in which educational teaching has been
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x